Latest Bodie Schematic

Okay, so I've learned to stop romanticizing vintage design yet again. I significantly increased the power supply filtering and oh my goodness is Bodie better now. Punchier with better bass response and less excess treble. I'm going to take this up another couple notches when I have more parts.

I also tweaked the bass half of a James tone stack for my bass control instead of the dual-coupling cap idea. The mid and high attenuation is very helpful, and now the possibility of bass "boost" can kick up a heavier butt for solo playing.

This is getting close to as good as it's going to get. I'm still tempted to tear apart the front end so that the second and third triode stages will be in parallel instead of the first and second. And I'm going to increase the power supply filtering a little more too, when I get some more power resistors. Knock these crazy voltages down a bit more.

Seriously, AES?

A COMPARISON OF CURRENT PRODUCTION 6 L 6 GC TUBES

CE Distribution / Antique Electronic Supply / Amplified Parts just put out this PDF where they plotted the frequency response of a single tube of each of the 6L6 family tubes they sell. 

 Okay, so this looks like a really useful document initially. They put a bunch of tubes on a tube tester, picked the average one, plugged it into an amp, plotted its frequency response, and let a guitarist subjectively describe the tone.

That last bit is a little like asking a mechanic what oil you should put in your car and then asking a guy who likes to drive how the different oils taste on bread, so I'm going to try to avoid commenting on "sizzling leads" versus "balanced and tight." If all you want is lurid prose about how many orgasms each tube brought the guitarist, there's no need to bring a tube tester or frequency plotter into this.

So ignoring the poet, we have the manufacturer's rated specs on the left. These are pretty much crap, as modern manufacturers largely just copy whatever was on the original data sheets. The maximum plate voltage is just a suggestion, let's be honest. Dissipation kills tubes, not voltage. And do we expect guitarists to know what their screen voltage is? Considering how common screen grid failure is, it would've been nice to include maximum screen dissipation buuut it doesn't matter anyway because the manufacturer's numbers are junk.

Back In The Day(tm), for a tube to be sold as a "6L6GC" it had to meet certain specs for plate dissipation, transconductance, envelope size, etc. No one cares about this any more, so it's understandable that there's some variation in rating and size from one manufacturer to another. Not to mention some of these tubes aren't even 6L6GCs, but Russian military tubes which were designed to be clones of 6L6GCs. That's another whole bag of worms, and it's fairly irrelevant, but it is interesting that some New Sensor 6L6GCs can take up to 40W on the plate comfortably.

What would really be interesting would be a comparison of transconductances, but considering a lot of these tubes are "close enough" to a 6L6GC I suspect there wouldn't be too many surprises. Specs on those Russian tubes (6P3S-E) are hard to track down, so it'd be nice to finally get some solid data. Anyway.

There are handy bar graphs of "lows," "mids," and "highs." This was kind of a mistake, or rather, how they define "low" and "high" is problematic. The open low E is 82 Hz, but this chart defines "lows" as 50 Hz. Even a baritone B string is 62 Hz, so the measurement of "lows" on these bar graphs is useless.

"Mids" are defined as 700 Hz, which is pretty reasonable.

"Highs" are defined as 6 kHz, which is not pretty reasonable. Most guitar speakers have already started rolling off around 5 kHz. 3kHz is around the "icepick" region and probably would've been a better choice.

To generate the frequency response graphs (and the guitarist gibberish,) they built a little single-ended guitar amp to put the tubes in. I take issue with a couple things here. First off, they didn't make a neutral Hi-Fi amp, they made a guitar amp. They describe the preamp as being a Blackface Fender design, and that's good for frequency plotting because there's certainly no limit to the low end, but unfortunately there's also a freaking tone stack! Yes, you can get a Blackface tonestack to be almost linear by turning up the mids to 10 and turning the bass and treble to zero, but did they do this for the frequency response plotting? Did they instead take the tone stack out of the circuit? These details aren't provided.

Anyway, these are graphs of just individual tubes so buying tube X and actually getting frequency response X is probably a crapshoot. Those little bumps are the result of manufacturing variances; if they averaged 10 of the same tube the responses would look much more similar brand-to-brand. Plotting dB on a linear scale instead of a logarithmic one is a little disingenuous too; even speaker manufacturers don't try that. Anyway, the biggest difference they show is roughly 2dB which is just under the threshold of what the human ear can discern as a difference in volume.

There is also the sizeable mid-hump which all the tested tubes exhibit. In the guitar community, 6L6s are widely considered to be somewhat "mid scooped" and the swap to EL34s will return these missing mids. At the very least, we can now clearly show everyone that the mid scoop comes from the circuit around the tubes, not the power tubes themselves. I suspect this bump in the frequencies is more related to the circuit, than a characteristic response of a 6L6.

In this case, the circuit these power tubes are plugged in is quite simple. Like I mentioned above, we have to assume they took the tone stack out of the circuit before measuring the frequency response of each tube. The circuit itself is single-ended, with no negative feedback. This is potentially a huge oversight - most guitar amps use a global NFB loop around the power tubes and phase inverter. I honestly can't think of a single 6L6-based amp that doesn't. I'm sure they're out there, of course.

The point being that NFB reduces distortion - the output is fed back to the input out of phase, so if the tube generates a boost at the output, that gets fed back to an earlier stage as a notch, and the result is a flat response. So, it makes sense that you would remove NFB if you wanted to plot a theoretical response of each tube to see if there really are significant differences from brand to brand.

But what happens when you put these tubes in your amp?

Even without NFB, a push-pull amp will cancel a noticeable amount of (even ordered) distortion. As the fluctuations in frequency response are largely sporadic, there would be significant cancellation of some deviations from linearity. Some would reinforce each other, so I suspect the overall response would look less choppy, though approximately the same.

With NFB though, all of that choppiness is going to cancel, so the only difference you're going to see is the overall y-axis offset - also known as the difference in emission & transconductance from tube to tube.

So to wrap this whole thing up:

• All these tubes are basically identical.
• There are some apparent deviations in frequency response at around +/- 2dB. 
• These differences are inaudible.
• Even if they were audible, most amps have NFB, so these deviations would cancel out.
• Only one tube of each brand was tested, so we have no idea if there are any trends among brands, or if CE Distribution just happened to select tubes that were basically identical. 
• This document is just a piece of marketing material, and shouldn't be viewed as anything but an advertisement. 

Bodie with zener-assisted cathode bias

I finally got around to trying the zener trick I mentioned a few months ago. Bodie's idle bias voltage was around 21V, and that surged up to 31V under heavy overdrive. A pair of 12V 5W zener diodes in series now clamp the cathode voltage at 24V. Maximum clean output power has risen from 19W to 23W. On the 'scope, crossover distortion is now only barely present during overdrive and the overdriven tone has increased rather dramatically. I think next time I'm going to have to try just straight fixed bias; 7591s lose so much in cathode bias. Not that I really need another 10-15W of output, but the tone is much improved. I can probably lower the plate voltages to something more sane than, say, 480V to keep the output level reasonable.

I'm going to be tweaking this amp for years, I just feel it.

For now, I still need to come up with a decent bass control. While I really like the "independent tone controls scattered throughout the preamp" approach, there aren't many very good one-knob bass controls. Sure, you can take the baxandall stack apart and just use the bass control from that, but it didn't work too well. It may be time to try a flat tilt control in place of just a dedicated bass control. That would give the user the option of cutting treble early and/or late, which would open up the preamp distortion characteristics a bit.

I'm tempted to start looking at FFTs of the frequency response to see if the NFB loop is causing any high-frequency strangeness. Given the (deliberately) limited bandwidth of the amp, square wave analysis is somewhat problematic, but it seems to indicate there's some unwanted phase shifting at high frequencies resulting in excess treble.

Then again, I might not notice that if I weren't using these vintage EV SRO speakers. It might even be good with a particularly dark speaker, but I feel a well-designed amp should work well with any speaker, though that may be something of an impossible goal.

Anyway.

It seems I lucked out picking a voltage for the zeners to latch the cathodes to; the plates are happy at the dissipation they're subjected to under heavy overdrive. I wonder if I could go a little colder though, get a little more squish out of the output section.

And I'm still thinking about the power supply. It's working fine, but could it be better...?

Yep, years of tweaking ahead.

New Crate Plans

Alright, so, I've decided to take the Crate rebuild in a different direction - Vox land. I was wondering if anyone would be interested in a single channel AC30 with no reverb or tremolo and it turns out yes, they call it a Trainwreck Rocket!

Now, of course, I'm going to have to deal with heat. I suppose I would have anyway (seeing how I don't work for Crate and thus am not comfortable hanging tubes below a completely sealed chassis) but cathode bias ups the heat load I'm going to have to dissipate. Also I'm going to put in (switchable) sag resistors to emulate tube rectification. Needs moar recs!

Here's what I've come up with so far. Still a lot of tweaking to be done. It's based on what people assume is in a Trainwreck Rocket, as well as the original AC30 top boost channel. I've added a handful of tweaks throughout; we'll see how they work.

• Parallel first triode. Why the hell leave it unused. Same gain, lower noise. 
• Arc protection on the cathode follower to help the tube survive switch-on.
• Grid stopper on the cathode follower. Just something I feel like trying. Figured I'd split the difference between 10k and 1M for starters. 
• Reduced grid leaks on the LTP to reduce noise. Reduced cap across the second input to help recovery from blocking distortion.
• Lar/Mar PPIMV
• Sizeable grid stoppers on the power tubes for better distortion.
• Power tubes biased in pairs, partially to spread the heat around, partially so one pair can be pulled. I might do individuals, we'll see.
• Zener-assisted bias for the power tubes. Cathode-biased 6V6s seem to distort nicely anyway, but this might be worth looking into.
• Switchable sag resistor for a "tube rectified" feel. Might make these bigger.
• Heaters referenced to power tube cathodes for free elevation. Humdinger to get the last of the noise out.
• 1k screen grid stoppers. 
• Grid stoppers everywhere. 10k for starters. 

Layout is going to be a big pain. All the tubes are in the center of the chassis, so I'm going to have to get clever. I'm tempted to start drawing it up in DIY Layout Creator or sort of CAD program. I may just use paper. It's going to have to be all point-to-point, but since this isn't going to be as much of a ground-up as Bodie was I'll be able to plan better.

Welp, I've been spending even less time in front of the computer lately, but I'll post again when I've got more to go on.

Bias Supply

This is how crazy easy this is. I bought a Triad VPL36-140, which is a tiny transformer that you can wire for either 18VAC or 36VAC.

Wired for 18VAC, I get ~24VDC. I'm not accurately simulating the load current, but 18*Sqrt(2) minus a couple volts for drop across the diode = yep.

Wired for 36VAC, I get ~49VDC.

Since I need only around -21V to bias the 7591s in Bodie, I'm thinking the 18V route is the way to go. Sure, even though I calculated the source impedances for both configurations (secondaries in series or parallel) I'm not sure I trust PSU Designer to accurately predict the load regulation on a tiny little 5VA transformer, especially considering the load current is going to be practically nil. Even assuming ~20k for a bias pot and a resistor to make sure the pot can't dump all the V- to ground, I'm still getting ~23VDC.

Merlin has R1 as 100k in his power supply book, which is probably more realistic for ripple reduction. I'll have to balance that against how long it'll take the bias supply to reach a stable voltage. Considering this is a full-wave bridge rectified supply, the ripple will be at 120 Hz which is much easier to filter than the standard half-wave rectifier in most guitar amps which pumps out 60 Hz ripple.

And hey, finally a little circuit where I can buy almost all the components at Rat Shack!

Marshall Class 5

This is a weird little amp. Unlike the Epiphone Valve Jr or any of its ilk (or even the good ol' Fender Champ) this guy has *two* preamp tubes. Only having one preamp tube (and thus two stages) seriously hinders a lot of Valve Jr mods. Sure, you can make a Champ (sort of; at least a Champ with an EL84) but if you want any more distortion than that without making the amp sound like an asthmatic 8-bit chainsaw, you're going to need to add at least one more gain stage.

A whole lot of amps make great sounds out of only 2 preamp tubes. Blackface Fenders, Tweed Fenders, classic Marshalls - even the JCM800 preamp, you only need 2 12AX7s. If you wanted a clean preamp, you could just follow the standard Blackface fender preamp and make yourself a nice little EL84 Champ. Let's ignore that one for now; this is a Marshall, remember?

 Okay, so let's look at some classic Marshall schematics.

So say you want a JTM45/Bluesbreaker:

So you have two channels, each gets one gain stage, then the signals combine and go through another gain stage and lastly a cathode follower pushes the signal through the tone stack and off to the power amp. Two preamp tubes.

How about a plexi? How about any of em?

Same deal - two channels, mix 'em together, slap a cathode follower and tone stack at the end, bam.

Since we really don't need two channels in this amp and we're keeping the power low so it'll be a sweet little distortion factory, how about the JCM800?

Slightly different! Only one channel, but two different paths. Low goes through one gain stage, then another, then the cathode follower & tone stack. High goes through one gain stage, and then right into the Low input. Kinda clever, yeah?

Unfortunately Marshall went out of business after the JCM800 was produced and they never went on to make channel-switching nu-metal fuel.

Okay, but we're seeing a pattern. It's a pattern that a whole lot of people like, and you could even go so far as to call it the crux of the Marshall.

• So you got your first gain stage. This just amplifies the signal enough for it to mess with other preamp tubes. There's a basketball term for this but I forget. Anyway, it just gets you started. 
• Then you have a volume pot, and then a second gain stage. When that volume pot is all the way up, that second gain stage is going to start distorting.
• Then we have a cathode follower, and this sucker started distorting a while ago. This'll be the first stage to break up.
• Now, after we've generated all that distortion, we shape it with the tone stack and send it on its merry way to the power amp. Well, to the phase inverter, but single-ended amps don't have those so it's moot. Because we're using a cathode follower to push the tone stack, the tone stack doesn't cost us much gain.

Compare that to a Blackface Fender preamp:

This is an AA165 Blackface Bassman and technically it uses 2 and a half tubes for the preamp, but if we were to make this a one-channel jobber we'd only need one and a half preamp tubes. We'd probably use two because most tubes stop working when you cut them in half.

• We go into a gain stage. Gotta start somewhere.
• SMACK dab into a tone stack. This one isn't driven by a cathode follower, so it's going to cost us a lot of gain. It's a fair tradeoff though: you can cut or "boost" the bass/treble much more this way. 
• Then through a volume control and finally a second gain stage. We're almost back to square one here. Not quite, but it'll be hard to overdrive this stage.
• Then into another gain stage that acts like a mixer. I picked the AA165 because the later AB165 uses a local NFB loop here to minimize any distortion this stage might generate. 
• Then we're off to the phase inverter & power amp.

So, this design makes sense for "Loud'n'Clean" Leo. Sure, you'll get some preamp distortion at the upper range of the volume pot, but the distortion will be generated after the tone controls, so we have much less control over how the distortion sounds. Distortion, as everyone intuitively knows, generates a lot of treble content, and wouldn't it be nice to tame that a little bit? Too damn bad!

Now, of course, there are other amps that are built for distortion which use a tone stack early in the preamp (though they often have a few more gain stages afterwards), and there are many other factors that make BF Fenders less than ideal distortion machines. My point is, Marshall has a recipe, and deviation from that recipe prevents you from getting a traditional Marshall sound.


So, now we finally get to the Class 5. You can find the whole schematic here.

Here's what Marshall decided to do with their two preamp tubes:

Where to begin...

• So we have our first gain stage. Fair enough. But wait! That grid-leak resistor is only 470k instead of the usual 1M! Kill it! Well, okay. It's not terrible at 470k, but compared to a 1M your guitar is going to start losing highs when you turn the guitar's volume knob down. It might also not play nicely with every effects pedal ever made. Reducing this resistor makes sense when you're getting close to the maximum grid circuit resistance for a preamp tube and you don't want to send DC through the guitar (6SJ7 I'm looking at you) but I honestly can't see a reason that this should be 470k. 
• Then we have a 47p capacitor to ground. Not sure why they put this before the grid stopper. After the grid stopper makes more sense; you could lower the grid stopper to reduce noise and keep RF interference from getting into the amp. It's not doing anything the Miller capacitance isn't already doing and it's so small that even with the guitar's volume control turned down almost all the way it's going to be rolling off treble that the guitar can't produce. 
• The first gainstage itself is fine. It's going to amplify a bunch of bass, which is okay in the first stage but usually not ideal.
• Then we have a gain control and immediately following it another coupling cap and voltage divider. I have no idea what they were trying to accomplish here. Grid stopper for cathode follower = good. DC path for grid pulldown = good. It would've been easier and cheaper to just put that 220k resistor between C9 and the volume pot and gotten rid of R7 and C13, so there must have been a reason, but I'm guessing it came after a few rounds of tweaking. 
• Then we have a cathode follower pushing a tone stack. So early in the preamp? We're not losing much gain, thanks to the cathode follower, but we also don't have a huge adjustment range for the controls, and since it's so early in the preamp it's not going to have that much influence on the distorted tone of the amp. Kind of the worst of both worlds. Cathode followers distort really interestingly in the traditional Marshall schematic, because they're DC coupled and biased quite warm so they're always tugging on the gain stage they're coupled to. Merlin goes on for a handful of pages about this in both editions of his preamp book and he does a much better job of it than I could, but because this is an AC coupled cathodyne, you're not getting that signature smooth distortion out of it. It's kind of a wasted stage here.
• Then the signal is attenuated in half and sent to a gain stage. Fair enough. The top half of that voltage divider is also acting as a big grid stopper, which minimizes blocking distortion and also rolls off some high treble, which we need to do because there's no tone stack coming later.
• And again, the signal is attenuated in half and sent to a gain stage. This one's a high-gain stage though, and since we're at the end of the preamp it's clear they're trying to get the power tube to break up before the preamp, and that's a noble goal. There's a whole ton of grid stopperage (two 470k resistors in series) which, in addition to the higher gain (notice the plate resistor is 220k) is going to roll off a good chunk of treble. I don't feel like doing the math right now, but this seems a little extreme, a little sloppy, and excessively noisy.
• Speaking of excessively noisy ways to cut treble, they put a cap across the anode resistor. This means any AC ripple is going to be injected right into that high-gain stage. The power supply seems pretty well designed, but this is a single-ended design so we really should be extra careful about that and put it after C5 if we really need to cut even more treble. You know, we could've just put the tone stack at the end of the preamp instead. Just sayin'...
• Then finally there's one last voltage divider and then the power tube.

I got to work on one of these recently, and the customer wanted these mods: Some Mods for Marshall Class 5, which I highly recommend as an easy and cost-efficient way to make this amp a whole lot better. The guy clearly knows his stuff, and while I think I would've tried some different things, I can only imagine he already did and these mods sound better.

It's not really a bad design, but considering the MSRP on these when they came out I expected a little better. Really going to town on one is pretty cost-prohibitive - who wants to dump another couple hundred rebuilding an amp that only cost a couple hundred to begin with?

I was tempted to come up with my own schematic, something I'd do if I were using a Class 5 as a donor amp and had more money than sense. Well, I guess I already meet that last criterion - based on the length of this post alone, I could be homeless and still have more money than sense. But really, if you were to gut this thing and build something inside of it, just build a Plexi or a JCM800 and call it a day. Maybe add a "preamp out" jack and run that to a beefy power amp. Or if you want something a little more unique, build a High-Octane inside. If you were really nuts and didn't mind buying all new iron, you could go for a Single-Ended Lead and really blow minds.

Alright, that's enough. I can think of a few more mods you could try on this thing - bootstrap the cathode follower to max out the gain of V1, add a freaking NFB loop for the love of god to get a crunchier overdrive and better cleans, DC-couple the cathode follower and move the volume pot to after it ( in place of jumper LK 21 perhaps), change C12 to a 1F cap for good luck... but I wouldn't have thought of the headphone mod. That's some cleverness right there.

Crate Stealth Plexi

Okay, so I'm walking back my previous schematic for turning the Crate Stealth combo into some crazily modded JCM800; I'm going to go for a lightly modded Plexi instead. It should be weird enough to have a ~30-40W plexi in an open-backed 112, with either a pair of EL34s or a quad of 6V6's.

Since the Crate's OT is fine I'm just going to use it. I have to double-check the turns ratio but if it's a 4k:4/8/16 I'll have a really hard time justifying the cost of buying a new Edcor or ClassicTone.

For the power transformer, I've decided on the Antek AS-1T275 partially for the cost, partially for the insane performance boost you get from using a toroidal transformer. Completely unloaded, it'll put out ~400VDC through a bridge rectifier. If I somehow manage to completely load it (e.g. power tubes completely overdriven to hell... and I manage to throw away another 50mA somehow) the plate voltage will only sag to ~370VDC. And, of course, it can handle the heater current without breaking a sweat.

The only downside is I'll have to use a separate bias transformer, though people have been known to find bias taps on these that aren't specified on the data sheet. In that case I'll have to use the more traditional full-wave rectifier instead of the full-wave bridge, but it's got two identical secondary windings with the phases indicated so that shouldn't be a problem.

Actually building this thing will be a little tricky. It would be great if Crate hadn't put the tubes right smack dab in the center of the chassis. This means my options are limited:

•  I could drill all new holes in the chassis for the tube sockets so that I have a nice big area in which to mount a turret board, but without buying chassis punches I'm thinking that would come out poorly. 
• I could leave the sockets where they are mount a turretboard above the sockets. I'm not sure if I have the vertical clearance to be able to do this, and since the tubes hang down they're going to be pouring heat right into the turret board. Not ideal.
• Or lastly I can get some skinny turret boards or even single-row turret strips, ignore the factory layout, and do something a little closer to point-to-point. 

I'm leaning towards the last one. Keystone makes cheap turret boards and strips in a variety of dimensions out of G-10 Garolite (glass epoxy) which I have yet to work with though I've seen it recommended highly for amp building.

This will also force me (allow me?) to disregard the original layout. That's fine; I don't particularly feel like buying some expensive cap cans anyway, and I can also design a quieter ground scheme.

For the bias supply: I'm going to try a Triad VPL36-140 which should be more than sufficient. Way more current than I need for a bias supply, but they're cheap. I've already purchased one of these for Bodie - running those 7591s in cathode bias has been a fun experiment but it kinda kills me to throw away ~15W of output power. Plus I have to bias them rather warm at idle to keep the rising cathode voltage from pushing them so far into cutoff, and even then the distortion tone suffers.

Of course, I could just follow the original schematics (in both cases) and build capacitor-coupled bias supplies. I've already had one bad run-in with those when I first started rebuilding Bodie - if they're not sufficiently loaded (say, you fire it up without the tubes in) the bias supply instead becomes a charge pump and all your filter caps see a rapidly-rising voltage. Props to whatever capacitors I was using back then for failing gracefully (instead of exploding) when subjected to 1000VDC. There have also been some rants against capacitor-coupled bias supplies over at MEF regarding their long-term reliability, so I think I'll just go with the $10 bias transformer and a half-dozen components, thanks.

Aah yes, and the filter caps. I'm keeping the plate voltages low (at least for a plexi) so standard 450V caps should be fine. Keeping the stock 450 and up plate voltages would mean needing to totem-pole some caps which takes up a whole bunch of room. Also I'm building this with the idea of using a quad of 6V6s (which is what was originally in the amp) and I know modern 6V6GTs can take that kind of plate voltage but why push it? So the amp'll break up a little earlier, oh no, not in a Plexi!

I still have to decide on whether or not to use a choke. I think most people would expect one in this sort of build, though they'd probably assume the bias transformer was one if I didn't tell them otherwise. And of course, this amp is only going to resemble a Plexi, not be a sincere attempt to clone one. The power supply is already going to be rather stiff, even if I go with the 68/69 filter cap values. Headroom would be improved, and the amp would be a touch louder.

I think I probably will use a choke, if only because I have to consider using two different types of output tubes. While the 6V6s won't pull much screen current, the EL34s definitely will. The question is will a quad of 6V6s pull as much screen current as a pair of EL34s? I'm thinking no. So with a dropping resistor for the screen supply, the screen and preamp voltages will drop more with the EL34s than with the 6V6s. Noticeably? I'll have to do the math. That may be a good thing though, really enhance the difference in the output tube choice. Pair of EL34s, it'll break up earlier. Quad of 6V6s, a little more headroom.

But with a choke, the EL34s will probably have similar headroom to the 6V6s. While arguments can be made about the plate curves of beam tetrodes (diode line) vs true pentodes (no knee) and their effects on distortion, the whole power section is wrapped in NFB anyway. There have been amps made that run a pair of pentodes alongside a pair of beam tetrodes with a pot to allow the player to pick one, the other, or some intermediate setting (IIRC a pair of 6L6GCs and a pair of EL34s) and most people report subtle differences at best.

So, I think that using an RC filter for the screen supply instead of an LC filter would enhance the "difference" in the two tube types. Artificially, it could be argued, sure. But the tone, man, the tone! Of course people will complain. Jim used chokes because Leo used chokes and you're not using a choke so this can't be any good. Bah. Bah!

I've been thinking that I'd like to try to sell this one but maybe this would be too much for the average guitarist. Well, no, I can put external bias points on the back of the amp. And the bias might not have to shift much. And hey, if the the primary impedance of the OT is what I suspect, they can even run a pair of 6V6GTs in there if they use a different speaker tap.

Man, I haven't even gotten to my preamp tweaks yet.

So yeah, a whole lot of work goes into these firebottles.